Blog #5: What I've Learned

I learned much more than I thought I would in this course, although when I say learned, what I really mean is understood. I admit I was spooked by the name of the course, expecting that it would be dense and difficult. It's actually been very enlightening! Before, I had a general idea of what qualitative and quantitative methods were, but the textbook, in-class examples, and writing projects made me feel much more comfortable with conducting (or at least proposing) research in various forms. There's a certain satisfaction that comes with composing a research proposal, despite the amount of time and effort it takes. I'm actually looking forward to the possibility of adjusting my topic in this course to fit my capstone now that I have a solid idea of what to do.

As a prof/tech writer, I've come to understand that "writing" or "editing" will never be my single role. Being a technical writer requires effective research skills and adaptability, both of which I had to employ for my literature review and research proposal. Connecting the dots, filling in the gaps, whatever you call it--that's a large part of a professional writer's responsibilities. I'm still unsure what I'm going to do in the future for an occupation, but I feel good about what I've learned/am learning and feel confident that the skills I'm developing will be useful wherever I end up.

It's been a pleasure reading/responding to your posts and having friendly in-class discussions with you all. Maybe I'll see some of you next semester in my capstone course. :)

Comments

  1. McBRachelNovember 4, 2020 at 5:30 PM

    Hey, Emi.
    I agree with you. The assignments in this course were really helpful. Now I understand (when I previously thought I did). It's been great to get to know you and I hope to see you around the capstone water cooler next semester. I'm sure whatever career path you choose, you will have something worthwhile to add!
    Best,
    Rachel

    ReplyDelete
  2. Brooke CarpenterNovember 4, 2020 at 5:35 PM

    Hey Emily! I was the same way with the course name. When I tell my friends I'm taking this course, it kind of is a confidence boost just because it sounds like it's so difficult! Granted, I think there were parts that have been challenging; like you said, this class helps you see just how much you have to adapt. I think that is the fun part though - seeing where it is that you actually end up. I love the fact that in this class, there has been room to change and for the research itself to grow, without you really forcing it into a direction. I guess I never really understood that before - that research is really just looking at the facts of what is happening in life and you are just the interpreter. Although it is hard work to be able to gather and slightly mold it, it is satisfying, like you said. Best of luck in the capstone! I'll probably see you there!!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog #4: Plans for Revision

 As would be expected, the first thing I plan to do for my research proposal is to make the needed/suggested corrections to my literature review and figure out how to condense it in such a way that includes all eight of my sources while maintaining effective synthesis. I also got some extremely valuable feedback on my proposal outline from Rachel, which will help me in fine tuning some of my interview and survey questions about the treatment of women in the PTW workplace/how feminine writing is perceived. To be honest, I think that once I get the skeleton of the project figured out, it'll go much smoother from there. I'm just a bit wary of how to fully structure my methods section and how to fit the literature review into the whole thing (especially knowing what length is appropriate). 12-15 pages feels a bit daunting, but having written a grant proposal before, I'm sure that when I actually piece it all together, it won't seem as difficult. I'm lucky in that my res...
Read more

Blog #3: The Research Gap

You could drive a van through the gaps in my research topic: women in professional and technical writing, how they're treated in the workplace, and what effect "feminine" writing/communication traits have on women's/writers' credibility. To be fair, this topic ended up being pretty broad because of how few sources I could find on just "feminine" writing styles/structures. There weren't even any articles that connected hedging with feminine language except in one article that only mentioned in briefly--this was very surprising to me, as I've heard several English and Communication Studies professors make the connection between hedging in speech/written language and women's tendency to do it. I ended up improvising as best I could and sort of made a 2 1/2 pronged literature review out of the sources I was able to connect to my main idea. I think I was able to synthesize them well enough, but I'm hoping that I'll be able to write a more ...
Read more

Blog Post #2: Research Topic and 10 Tentative Sources

My research topic for my literature review will tackle technical communication (written) practices and gendered language in the workplace. The central question is a bit malleable depending on what information I can derive from the available source material, but I'm excited to dig in and see what I can find. I currently have 11 tentative sources: Bardolph, D. (2014). A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF RECENT GENDERED PUBLISHING TRENDS IN AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY. American Antiquity, 79(3), 522-540. doi:10.2307/43184920 Calvert, S. (2013). Gendered Narratives of Innovation Through Competition: Lessons From Science and Technology Studies. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 54(1), 3-14. Retrieved September 16, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43686928 Cech, E., Rubineau, B., Silbey, S., & Seron, C. (2011). Professional Role Confidence and Gendered Persistence in Engineering. American Sociological Review, 76(5), 641-666. doi:10.2307/23019214 Grebelsky-Lichtman, T., ...
Read more