Emily Mildenhall English 3450

 As would be expected, the first thing I plan to do for my research proposal is to make the needed/suggested corrections to my literature review and figure out how to condense it in such a way that includes all eight of my sources while maintaining effective synthesis. I also got some extremely valuable feedback on my proposal outline from Rachel, which will help me in fine tuning some of my interview and survey questions about the treatment of women in the PTW workplace/how feminine writing is perceived. To be honest, I think that once I get the skeleton of the project figured out, it'll go much smoother from there. I'm just a bit wary of how to fully structure my methods section and how to fit the literature review into the whole thing (especially knowing what length is appropriate). 12-15 pages feels a bit daunting, but having written a grant proposal before, I'm sure that when I actually piece it all together, it won't seem as difficult. I'm lucky in that my res...

You could drive a van through the gaps in my research topic: women in professional and technical writing, how they're treated in the workplace, and what effect "feminine" writing/communication traits have on women's/writers' credibility. To be fair, this topic ended up being pretty broad because of how few sources I could find on just "feminine" writing styles/structures. There weren't even any articles that connected hedging with feminine language except in one article that only mentioned in briefly--this was very surprising to me, as I've heard several English and Communication Studies professors make the connection between hedging in speech/written language and women's tendency to do it. I ended up improvising as best I could and sort of made a 2 1/2 pronged literature review out of the sources I was able to connect to my main idea. I think I was able to synthesize them well enough, but I'm hoping that I'll be able to write a more ...